![]() See auditing best practices for Active Directory and Office 365. Inadequate auditing-More often than not, DART finds that organizations don’t turn on auditing or have misconfigured auditing with the result that there is not a full record of attacker activities.While the average dwell time numbers are trending downward, it’s still measured in days (usually double digit numbers) and days of access to your systems is plenty of time to do massive damage. Over the years, we’ve seen that industry-wide detection has stayed the weakest of the Protect, Detect, Respond triad. Detection is critical (and weak)-One of the first priorities when the team engages to assist with an incident investigation at a customer site is to increase the detection capability of that organization.Consequently, we help organizations across many different industry verticals and from those experiences we have collated some key lessons: It’s not uncommon that an organization’s ability to detect and respond to security incidents is inadequate to cope with skilled attackers who will spend days and weeks profiling the organization and its employees. This experience means that DART’s tooling and communication requirements during incident investigations tend to be a bit more demanding than most in-house teams, given we’re often working with complex global environments. The team contributes knowledge and technology back to the product groups, who leverage that experience into our products, so our customers can benefit from our (hard-won) lessons learned during our investigations. Tools have evolved from primarily bespoke (custom) tools into a blend of commercially available Microsoft detection solutions plus bespoke tools, most of which extend the core Microsoft detection capabilities. Key lessons learned from DART’s investigation evolutionĭART’s investigation procedures and technology have evolved over 14 years of assisting our customers during some of the worst hack attacks on record. ![]() In upcoming posts, we’ll cover each tool in-depth and elaborate on techniques and procedures used by the team. Today, we introduce the team and give a brief overview of each of the tools that utilize the power of the cloud. This is the first in a blog series discussing the tools, techniques, and procedures that the Microsoft Detection and Response Team (DART) use to investigate cybersecurity incidents at our customer organizations. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management.Microsoft Purview Information Protection.Information protection Information protection.Microsoft Priva Subject Rights Requests.Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance.Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management.Risk management & privacy Risk management & privacy.Microsoft Intune Endpoint Privilege Management.Endpoint security & management Endpoint security & management.Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management.Microsoft Defender Cloud Security Posture Mgmt.Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory). ![]() Next in the series is a discussion of automation and the deep level customization that can introduce truly compelling imaging scenarios. The video linked below was prepared by Steven Rachui, a Principal Premier Field Engineer focused on manageability technologies. In addition, a demonstration is presented that shows how the DaRT binaries can be used in the Configuration Manager Windows PE boot media to facilitate remote control during the Windows PE phase of imaging. ![]() This session is a discussion of DaRT, what it is and how it can be deployed using standard OSD imaging techniques. This is part nineteen of a series discussing the Operating System Deployment feature of Configuration Manager. First published on TECHNET on Sep 05, 2018 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |